When I started submitting things here I mentioned that I was fond of quotes – then rarely used any since. I’m going to make up for that today with something I read recently:
“…We are as concerned as anybody else about the headlong plunge into the abyss that Western Civilization seems to be taking. We believe the voices that may recall the West to sanity are those which have taken part in the Great Conversation. We want them to be heard again – not because we want to go back to antiquity, or the Middle Ages, or the Renaissance, or the Eighteenth Century. We are quite aware that we do not live in any time but the present, and, distressing as the present is, we would not care to live in any other time if we could. We want the voices of the Great Conversation to be heard again because we think they may help us to learn how to live better now.
…We believe that the reduction of the citizen to an object of propaganda, private and public, is one of the greatest dangers to democracy. A prevalent notion is that the great mass of the people cannot understand and cannot form an independent judgment upon any matter; they cannot be educated, in the sense of developing their intellectual powers, but they can be bamboozled. The reiteration of slogans, the distortion of the news, the great storm of propaganda that beats upon the citizen twenty-four hours a day all his life long mean either that democracy must fall a prey to the loudest and most persistent propagandists or that the people must save themselves by strengthening their minds so that they can appraise the issues for themselves.
Great books alone will not do the trick; for the people must have the information on which to base a judgment as well as the ability to make one. In order to understand inflation, for example, and to have an intelligent opinion on what can be done about it, the economic facts of a given country at a given time have to be available. Great books cannot help us there. But they can help us to that grasp of history, politics, morals, and economics and to that habit of mind which are needed to form a valid judgment on the issue. Great books may even help us to know what information we should demand. If we knew what information to demand we might have a better chance of getting it.
…the idea that liberal education is
the education that everybody ought to have, and that the best way to
a liberal education in the West is through the greatest works the
West has produced, is still, in our view, the best educational idea
there is.”
Preface to Britannica’s Great Books of the Western
World, “The Great Conversation: The Substance of a Liberal
Education – Robert M. Hutchins, December 1, 1951.
It would appear that we’ve done little better than bail water for nearly 70 years – while the water in our collective boat has steadily risen. What is this great conversation that offers salvation? In its most simplistic terms the great conversation is nothing more than western history’s ongoing dialogue with the present about what is and what should be. Hutchins describes the tradition of the West as:
“…embodied in the great conversation which began in the dawn of history and that continues to the present day. …The goal towards which Western society moves is the Civilization of the Dialogue. The spirit of Western civilization is the spirit of inquiry. …Nothing is to remain undiscussed. Everybody is to speak his mind. No proposition is to be left unexamined. The exchange of ideas is held to be the path of the realization of the potentialities of the race.”
Hutchins adumbrates our time with this sentence:
“…To put an end to the spirit of inquiry that has characterized the West it is not necessary to burn the books. All we have to do is leave them unread for a few generations. On the other hand, the revival of interest in these books from time to time throughout history has provided the West with new drive and creativeness. Great books have salvaged, preserved, and transmitted the tradition on many occasions similar to our own.”
If there was ever a time to salvage, preserve, and transmit, now is that time.
So what exactly am I trying to say here?
I suppose all of this is leading up to some sort of prescription. We find ourselves in a desperate situation. Never has the need for an informed citizenry been higher while our dialogue so far from civil. Conservatives will read the words “liberal education” and in their minds translate that into “doctrination into being liberal” when what is being referred to is hardly that. Liberal education in this sense means nonvocational, nonspecializing education in the Western tradition. Hutchens describes liberal arts students as liberal artists, able to learn how to:
“…read, write, speak, listen, understand, and think. He learns to reckon, measure, and manipulate matter, quantity, and motion in order to predict, produce, and exchange. As we live in the tradition, whether we know it or not, so we are all liberal artists, whether we know it or not. We all practice the liberal arts, well or badly, all the time every day.
…The liberal arts are not merely indispensable; they are unavoidable. Nobody can decide for himself whether he is going to be a human being. The only question open to him is whether he will be an ignorant, undeveloped one or one who has sought to reach the highest point he is capable of attaining. The question, in short, is whether he will be a poor liberal artist or a good one.”
A liberal education spans the history of western thought: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Here you will find St. Thomas Aquinas wrapping his arm around Aristotle and Newton hungrily accepting the work of Kepler even as Ptolemy lifts a head no less proud for his error. A good liberal education acquaints one with the universal questions and troubles of all mankind and a great liberal education seeks to develop minds not only capable, but eager to form independent judgments in service to the true and good. A liberal education allows one to know, as much as possible, just what is true and good. Or failing that, at least what is false and bad.
The lamentation of the death of a liberal education has been echoing off the stone walls of the American educational system for at least as long as 1951. I know this because I can still hear Mr Hutchins’ wail in the pages of his preface of a collection of works which provides just such an education. Fortunately, we live in a time when it’s even easier to obtain a liberal education, material wise, than it was in 1951. The complete set of Britannica’s Great Books of the Western World spans over 2500 years of western civilization, with great care taken to select titles that were, in the Advisory board’s mind, indispensable to the Great Conversation.
I was gifted this set recently and it is a wonderful spotlight into the cracks and chasms of my own education. Not only that, it offers a guide to tackling these works, meant to be read without synopsis or preface excepting the one which precedes the collection itself. The reader is encouraged, indeed, must, read these authors for herself, without an intermediary telling her what to think. As later authors respond to, contradict, supplant, or deny their predecessors’ view on a particular subject, the reader is provided a string of thought which winds through the centuries, leaving her to ponder just where she is now.
Up until this point, I’ve danced around prescribing everyone engage in their own course of self improvement, to become, as Hutchins put it, a good liberal artist. But of course that’s exactly what I’m saying. Few of us tread so high we avoid all the sludge. It is unfashionable nowadays to prescribe a canonical list of dead white men that everyone “ought” to read.
Too fucking bad:
Homer
Aeschylus
Sophocles
Euripides
Aristophanes
Herodotus
Thucydides
Plato
Aristotle
Hippocrates
Galen
Euclid
Archimedes
Apollonius
Nicomachus
Lucretius
Epictetus
Marcus Aurelius
Virgil
Plutarch
Tacitus
Ptolemy
Copernicus
Kepler
Plotinus
Augustine
Thomas Aquinas
Dante
Chaucer
Machiavelli
Hobbes
Rabelais
Montaigne
Shakespeare
Gilbert
Galileo
Harvey
Cervantes
Francis Bacon
Descartes
Spinoza
Milton
Pascal
Newton
Huygens
Locke
Berkeley
Hume
Swift
Sterne
Fielding
Montesquieu
Rousseau
Adam Smith
Gibbon
Kant
American State Papers
The Federalist
J.S. Mill
Boswell
Lavoisier
Fourier
Faraday
Hegel
Goethe
Melville
Darwin
Marx
Engels
Tolstoy
Dostoevsky
William James
Freud
The set ends with Freud even as we understand that the conversation continued and does so until today.
It is by no means an exhaustive list and interested readers are encouraged to add their own recommendations.
As a final note of encouragement, be undaunted by the scope and number of these authors. They were merely men seeking to understand the world around them, attempting to put forth their ideas in a way that everyone ought to be able to engage with. Getting through all of these authors is not easy, even when accounting for the inevitable skipping of interminably dry stretches that exist in many of these works. But even the discretionary exercise of skipping is part of what makes up the skill set of a liberal artist. Separating the wheat from the chaff is a necessary part of reaping the harvest.
In this age of specialization and special interests the future needs as many generalist liberal artists as we can get. Try and learn something new everyday and don’t let anyone tell you the ancients have nothing to contribute.
Frankly, we need all the help we can get.